4 × 6 TB in RAID 6: the numbers
| Usable space | 12 TB (10.9 TB in Windows) |
|---|---|
| Raw space | 24 TB |
| Used for protection | 12 TB |
| Efficiency | 50% |
| Drives that can fail | Any 2 |
| Rebuild at 150 MB/s | 11 h |
| Rebuild at 50 MB/s (busy) | 33 h |
| Data read during rebuild | 18 TB |
| Read error risk, desktop drives | 76% (corrected) |
| Read error risk, NAS drives | 13% (corrected) |
Rebuild
Replacing a failed drive means writing a full 6 TB drive. At 150 MB/s with no other load that takes about 11 h; on a busy array running at 50 MB/s, about 33 h. The rebuild reads every surviving drive: 18 TB in total.
Read errors
Reading 18 TB, the chance of at least one unreadable sector is 76% with desktop drives (1 per 1014 bits) and 13% with NAS drives (1 per 1015). The second parity corrects it, so the rebuild finishes without losing data.
Our take
With four drives, RAID 6 and RAID 10 both give 12 TB. RAID 6 survives any two failures; RAID 10 writes and rebuilds faster. With 6 TB drives, RAID 5 would give 18 TB with a rebuild of 11 h. RAID 6 is still the safer choice for data you cannot replace.